Հատված
Այս աշխատանքի հատվածը անհասանելի է։
Գրականության ցանկ
1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. www.apa.org/science/standards.html
2. Breland, H., Bridgeman, B. & Fowles, M. E. (1999). Writing assessment in admission to higher education: Review and framework (ETS Research Rep. No. 99-03). Princeton, NJ: ETS. Available on the Web at: www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-99-03
3. Brennan, R. L. (1983). Elements of generalizability theory. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, (16), 297-334.
5. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Powers, D., Santos, T. & Taylor, C. (2000). TOEFL 2000 writing framework: A working paper. (TOEFL Monograph No. 18). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
6. Haertel, E. H. (2006). Reliability. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., 65 – 110). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
7. Kolen, M J. & Brennan, R.L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
8. Lee, Y.-W. & Kantor, R. (2005). Dependability of new ESL writing test scores: Evaluating prototype tasks and alternative rating schemes. ETS Research Report (RR-05-14). Princeton, NJ: ETS. http://infoport/sites/rrpts/publications/RR-05-14.pdf
9. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Pearlman, M. (2008). Finalizing the test blueprint. In C. Chapelle, M. K. Enright & J. M. Jamieson (Eds.), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language™. New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
11. Zhang, Y. (2008). Repeater analyses for TOEFL iBT. ETS Research Report (RM-08-05). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
2. Breland, H., Bridgeman, B. & Fowles, M. E. (1999). Writing assessment in admission to higher education: Review and framework (ETS Research Rep. No. 99-03). Princeton, NJ: ETS. Available on the Web at: www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-99-03
3. Brennan, R. L. (1983). Elements of generalizability theory. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing Program.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, (16), 297-334.
5. Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Powers, D., Santos, T. & Taylor, C. (2000). TOEFL 2000 writing framework: A working paper. (TOEFL Monograph No. 18). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
6. Haertel, E. H. (2006). Reliability. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., 65 – 110). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
7. Kolen, M J. & Brennan, R.L. (1995). Test equating: Methods and practices. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
8. Lee, Y.-W. & Kantor, R. (2005). Dependability of new ESL writing test scores: Evaluating prototype tasks and alternative rating schemes. ETS Research Report (RR-05-14). Princeton, NJ: ETS. http://infoport/sites/rrpts/publications/RR-05-14.pdf
9. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Pearlman, M. (2008). Finalizing the test blueprint. In C. Chapelle, M. K. Enright & J. M. Jamieson (Eds.), Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language™. New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
11. Zhang, Y. (2008). Repeater analyses for TOEFL iBT. ETS Research Report (RM-08-05). Princeton, NJ: ETS.