Problem of Actualization of Illocutive Functions of Interrogative and Imperative Sentences in teaching English

Գին՝ 22800դրամ
Էջերի քանակ՝ 38էջ
Աշխատանքի տեսակ՝ Դիպլոմային
Աշխատանքի ID` 12667

Բովանդակություն

Chapter One

Theoretical Ground for the Study of Interrogative and Imperative Sentences as Indirect Speech Acts

1.1. Theory of Speech Acts. Their type

1.2. Communicative types of Sentences

Chapter Two

Interrogative and Imperative Sentences as Indirect Speech Acts.

2.1. Structure of Interrogative and imperative sentences

2.2. Illocutive functions of interrogative sentences

2.3.    Illocutive functions of imperative sentences

References

Հատված

In his famous work, “How to do Things with Words,” J. L. Austin outlined his theory of speech acts and the concept of performative language, in which to say something is to do something. To make the statement “I promise that p” (in which p is the propositional content of the utterance) is to perform the act of promising as opposed to making a statement that may be judged true or false. Performatives cannot be true or false, only felicitous or infelicitous. Austin creates a clear distinction between performatives and constantives, statements that attempt to describe reality and can be judged true or false, but he eventually comes to the conclusion that most utterances, at their base, are performative in nature. That is, the speaker is nearly always doing something by saying something.   For Austin, what the speaker is doing is creating social realities within certain social contexts. For example, using an explicit performative, to say “I now pronounce you man and wife” in the context of a wedding, in which one is marrying two people, is to create a social reality, i.e. in this case a married couple.

Գրականության ցանկ

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  2. Alexander, L.G. English Grammar. London: Longman, 1988
  3. Allan, K. (1986). Linguistic Meaning: Vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Inc.
  4. Arzoumanyan, E., English Grammar: Syntax, Yerevan, 2009
  5. Bach, Kent and R. M. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1979
  6. Bardovi-Harlig, K., Hartford, R. Mahan-Taylor, M.J. Morgan, & D.W. Reynold, Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal,1991
  7. Brown, P. & Levinson, S., Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomenon. In E.N. Goody (Ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1978
  8. Curme, George O. English Grammar. New York: Barnes & Noble Books, 1971.
  9. De Beaugrande, Robert. Function and form in language: theory and research, Functions of Language, 1994
  10. ….
Պատվիրել/